Definition
This is a type of Proof by Cases
Definition
the original conditional statement wtih a hypothesis made up of a disjunction of propositions can be proved by proving each of the conditional statements individually.
To prove , we can find and then individually prove every case.
Link to original
- Some theorems can be proved by examining a small number of examples
- We call this exhaustive proofs
- Better for computers, but even those have limits
Common Errors
Common Errors
- Drawing incorrect conclusions from examples
- No matter how many cases we cover in our own proof, we cannot prove the theorem to be true unless we prove every case
Example: if is a real number, then is a positive real number.
Proof: Let us consider two cases:
- is positive, since a positive number times a positive number is positive, must be positive.
- is negative, since a negative number times a negative number is positive, must be positive This “completes” the proof (no it doesn’t. the proof is wrong)
Why? : we missed the case where
Link to original
Example: It is true that every non-negative integer is the sum of 18 fourth power integers.
: To determine if a non-negative integer can can be written as a sum of 18 fourth powers, we might begin to examine whether is the sum of 18 fourth power integers for the smallest non-negative integers.
Fourth power integers: .
We can show that non-negative integers add up to ?? can be written as a sum of 18 fourth powers.
One might conclude it is possible based on this example, but 79 cannot be written as a sum of 18 fourth powers.
Example: Prove that if is a positive integer such that
Proof:
is a positive integer where . Therefore,
For
And
Since, , therefore, for , . Repeat this line of reasoning for